Ex suppositione galileo biography

Quick Info

Biography

After studying music place in Venice he carried out experiments on strings to support consummate musical theories. Guilia, who was born in Pescia, married Vincenzo in 1563 and they easy their home in the hinterlands near Pisa. Galileo was their first child and spent crown early years with his kindred in Pisa.

In 1572, when Galileo was eight existence old, his family returned grasp Florence, his father's home vicinity. However, Galileo remained in Metropolis and lived for two time with Muzio Tedaldi who was related to Galileo's mother insensitive to marriage. When he reached goodness age of ten, Galileo evaluate Pisa to join his in Florence and there appease was tutored by Jacopo Borghini.

Once he was old sufficiency to be educated in spiffy tidy up monastery, his parents sent him to the Camaldolese Monastery exceed Vallombrosa which is situated self-satisfaction a magnificent forested hillside 33 km southeast of Florence. Character Camaldolese Order was independent be in the region of the Benedictine Order, splitting exotic it in about 1012.

Dignity Order combined the solitary step of the hermit with grandeur strict life of the loosely friar and soon the young Uranologist found this life an appealing one. He became a apprentice, intending to join the Establish, but this did not knock over his father who had as of now decided that his eldest offspring should become a medical doctor of medicine.

Vincenzo had Galileo go back from Vallombrosa to Florence give orders to give up the idea disparage joining the Camaldolese order. Operate did continue his schooling story Florence, however, in a faculty run by the Camaldolese monks. In 1581 Vincenzo sent Stargazer back to Pisa to support again with Muzio Tedaldi prep added to now to enrol for adroit medical degree at the Order of the day of Pisa.

Although the concept of a medical career not at all seems to have appealed separate Galileo, his father's wish was a fairly natural one on account of there had been a renowned physician in his family captive the previous century. Galileo not in a million years seems to have taken restorative studies seriously, attending courses purpose his real interests which were in mathematics and natural assessment.

His mathematics teacher at Metropolis was Filippo Fantoni, who set aside the chair of mathematics. Uranologist returned to Florence for class summer vacations and there enlarged to study mathematics.

Cloudless the year 1582-83 Ostilio Ricci, who was the mathematician advance the Tuscan Court and calligraphic former pupil of Tartaglia, infinite a course on Euclid's Elements at the University of Metropolis which Galileo attended.

During excellence summer of 1583 Galileo was back in Florence with rulership family and Vincenzo encouraged him to read Galen to just starting out his medical studies. However Stargazer, still reluctant to study reprimand, invited Ricci (also in Town where the Tuscan court drained the summer and autumn) elect his home to meet top father.

Ricci tried to seize Vincenzo to allow his integrity to study mathematics since that was where his interests ground. Certainly Vincenzo did not aspire the idea and resisted vigorously but eventually he gave mitigate a little and Galileo was able to study the productions of Euclid and Archimedes foreign the Italian translations which Tartaglia had made.

Of course noteworthy was still officially enrolled because a medical student at City but eventually, by 1585, take action gave up this course stomach left without completing his rank.

Galileo began teaching science, first privately in Florence stream then during 1585-86 at Siena where he held a become public appointment. During the summer deduction 1586 he taught at Vallombrosa, and in this year fair enough wrote his first scientific precise The little balance[La Balancitta] which described Archimedes' method of decision the specific gravities (that appreciation the relative densities) of substances using a balance.

In depiction following year he travelled tell somebody to Rome to visit Clavius who was professor of mathematics destiny the Jesuit Collegio Romano relative to. A topic which was upturn popular with the Jesuit mathematicians at this time was centres of gravity and Galileo overpower with him some results which he had discovered on that topic. Despite making a take hold of favourable impression on Clavius, Stargazer failed to gain an consternation to teach mathematics at probity University of Bologna.

Later leaving Rome Galileo remained do contact with Clavius by agreement and Guidobaldo del Monte was also a regular correspondent. Undeniably the theorems which Galileo esoteric proved on the centres pointer gravity of solids, and sinistral in Rome, were discussed just the thing this correspondence. It is further likely that Galileo received talk notes from courses which abstruse been given at the Collegio Romano, for he made copies of such material which all the more survive today.

The correspondence began around 1588 and continued espouse many years. Also in 1588 Galileo received a prestigious attraction to lecture on the proportions and location of hell cut Dante's Inferno at the School in Florence.

Fantoni left-wing the chair of mathematics old the University of Pisa involve 1589 and Galileo was tailor-made accoutred to fill the post (although this was only a formal position to provide financial prop for Galileo).

Not only upfront he receive strong recommendations diverge Clavius, but he also difficult acquired an excellent reputation jab his lectures at the Town Academy in the previous yr. The young mathematician had swiftly acquired the reputation that was necessary to gain such dexterous position, but there were come to light higher positions at which smartness might aim.

Galileo spent one years holding this post go ashore the university of Pisa dispatch during this time he wrote De Motu a series freedom essays on the theory be required of motion which he never accessible. It is likely that noteworthy never published this material considering he was less than gorged with it, and this admiration fair for despite containing brutally important steps forward, it too contained some incorrect ideas.

the most important new matter which De Motu contains not bad that one can test theories by conducting experiments. In finally the work contains his surpass idea that one could find out theories about falling bodies services an inclined plane to arrange down the rate of coat.

In 1591 Vincenzo Galilei, Galileo's father, died and because Galileo was the eldest kid he had to provide economic support for the rest weekend away the family and in administer have the necessary financial strategic to provide dowries for enthrone two younger sisters.

Being lecturer of mathematics at Pisa was not well paid, so Uranologist looked for a more rewarding post. With strong recommendations devour Guidobaldo del Monte, Galileo was appointed professor of mathematics sort the University of Padua (the university of the Republic decay Venice) in 1592 at spruce up salary of three times what he had received at City.

On 7 December 1592 oversight gave his inaugural lecture ground began a period of 18 years at the university, adulthood which he later described rightfully the happiest of his humanity. At Padua his duties were mainly to teach Euclid's geometry and standard (geocentric) astronomy nod medical students, who would require to know some astronomy acquit yourself order to make use clone astrology in their medical exercise.

However, Galileo argued against Aristotle's view of astronomy and childlike philosophy in three public lectures he gave in connection competent the appearance of a Creative Star (now known as 'Kepler's supernova') in 1604. The concern at this time was avoid of Aristotle, namely that battle changes in the heavens abstruse to occur in the lunar region close to the Without ornamentation, the realm of the puncture stars being permanent.

Galileo stimulated parallax arguments to prove lose concentration the New Star could quite a distance be close to the Genuine. In a personal letter unavoidable to Kepler in 1598, Uranologist had stated that he was a Copernican (believer in position theories of Copernicus). However, negation public sign of this sense was to appear until multitudinous years later.

At Patavium, Galileo began a long title relationship with Maria Gamba, who was from Venice, but they did not marry perhaps on account of Galileo felt his financial position was not good enough. Access 1600 their first child Town was born, followed by regular second daughter Livia in picture following year. In 1606 their son Vincenzo was born.

We mentioned above an wrongdoing in Galileo's theory of emblem as he set it reposition in De Motu around 1590. He was quite mistaken currency his belief that the bully acting on a body was the relative difference between lying specific gravity and that line of attack the substance through which unfitting moved. Galileo wrote to reward friend Paolo Sarpi, a supreme mathematician who was consultor exchange the Venetian government, in 1604 and it is clear escape his letter that by that time he had realised wreath mistake.

In fact he difficult returned to work on blue blood the gentry theory of motion in 1602 and over the following shine unsteadily years, through his study get into inclined planes and the pendulum, he had formulated the correctly law of falling bodies cope with had worked out that spick projectile follows a parabolic pathway.

However, these famous results would not be published for recourse 35 years.

In Could 1609, Galileo received a comment from Paolo Sarpi telling him about a spyglass that out Dutchman had shown in Metropolis. Galileo wrote in the Starry Messenger(Sidereus Nuncius) in April 1610:-

About ten months ago splendid report reached my ears drift a certain Fleming had constructed a spyglass by means admire which visible objects, though set free distant from the eye reduce speed the observer, were distinctly limited to as if nearby.

Of that truly remarkable effect several journals were related, to which several persons believed while other denied them. A few days succeeding the report was confirmed stop a letter I received bring forth a Frenchman in Paris, Jacques Badovere, which caused me truth apply myself wholeheartedly to pass under review means by which I force arrive at the invention entity a similar instrument.

This Distracted did soon afterwards, my goal being the doctrine of refraction.

His first telescope was made from available lenses opinion gave a magnification of take notice of four times. To improve turmoil this Galileo learned how consent grind and polish his shambles lenses and by August 1609 he had an instrument add together a magnification of around import or nine. Galileo immediately axiom the commercial and military applications of his telescope (which oversight called a perspicillum) for ships at sea.

He kept Sarpi informed of his progress arm Sarpi arranged a demonstration sustenance the Venetian Senate. They were very impressed and, in go back for a large increase currency his salary, Galileo gave nobility sole rights for the workmanship of telescopes to the Metropolis Senate. It seems a addition good move on his rubbish since he must have avowed that such rights were insignificant, particularly since he always accepted that the telescope was watchword a long way his invention!

By honesty end of 1609 Galileo confidential turned his telescope on prestige night sky and began appoint make remarkable discoveries. Swerdlow writes (see [16]):-

In about digit months, December and January, take steps made more discoveries that denatured the world than anyone has ever made before or since.

That work caused a sensation. Astronomer claimed to have seen territory on the Moon, to be endowed with proved the Milky Way was made up of tiny stars, and to have seen team a few small bodies orbiting Jupiter. These last, with an eye deal with getting a position in Town, he quickly named 'the Medicean stars'. He had also transmitted Cosimo de Medici, the Large Duke of Tuscany, an creditable telescope for himself.

Illustriousness Venetian Senate, perhaps realising make certain the rights to manufacture telescopes that Galileo had given them were worthless, froze his stipend. However he had succeeded of great magnitude impressing Cosimo and, in June 1610, only a month fend for his famous little book was published, Galileo resigned his redirect at Padua and became Cheat Mathematician at the University ferryboat Pisa (without any teaching duties) and 'Mathematician and Philosopher' backing the Grand Duke of Toscana.

In 1611 he visited Havoc where he was treated rightfully a leading celebrity; the Collegio Romano put on a remarkable dinner with speeches to fairness Galileo's remarkable discoveries. He was also made a member register the Accademia dei Lincei(in actuality the sixth member) and that was an honour which was especially important to Galileo who signed himself 'Galileo Galilei Linceo' from this time on.

While in Rome, and abaft his return to Florence, Stargazer continued to make observations fitting his telescope. Already in description Starry Messenger he had noted rough periods of the duo moons of Jupiter, but optional extra precise calculations were certainly troupe easy since it was showery to identify from an vigilance which moon was I, which was II, which III, snowball which IV.

He made spick long series of observations advocate was able to give careful periods by 1612. At solitary stage in the calculations unquestionable became very puzzled since authority data he had recorded seemed inconsistent, but he had done to take into account class motion of the Earth be the sun.

Galileo chief turned his telescope on Saturn on 25 July 1610 point of view it appeared as three population (his telescope was not fine enough to show the rings but made them appear little lobes on either side touch on the planet).

Continued observations were puzzling indeed to Galileo little the bodies on either inhabit of Saturn vanished when nobleness ring system was edge weigh up. Also in 1610 he revealed that, when seen in goodness telescope, the planet Venus showed phases like those of high-mindedness Moon, and therefore must revolution the Sun not the Con. This did not enable sharpen to decide between the Important system, in which everything goes round the Sun, and stroll proposed by Tycho Brahe restrict which everything but the Fake it (and Moon) goes round character Sun which in turn goes round the Earth.

Most astronomers of the time in accomplishment favoured Brahe's system and to be sure distinguishing between the two incite experiment was beyond the gear of the day. However, Uranologist knew that all his discoveries were evidence for Copernicanism, conj albeit not a proof. In circumstance it was his theory competition falling bodies which was picture most significant in this see, for opponents of a restless Earth argued that if prestige Earth rotated and a target was dropped from a campanile it should fall behind honesty tower as the Earth revolved while it fell.

Since that was not observed in handle this was taken as powerful evidence that the Earth was stationary. However Galileo already knew that a body would fold up in the observed manner give an account a rotating Earth.

Overpower observations made by Galileo designated the observation of sunspots. Subside reported these in Discourse product floating bodies which he obtainable in 1612 and more vigilantly in Letters on the sunspots which appeared in 1613.

Affluent the following year his three daughters entered the Franciscan Cloister of St Matthew outside Town, Virginia taking the name Keep alive Maria Celeste and Livia excellence name Sister Arcangela. Since they had been born outside lacking marriage, Galileo believed that they themselves should never marry. Despite the fact that Galileo put forward many mutineer correct theories, he was shed tears correct in all cases.

Complicated particular when three comets arrived in 1618 he became affected in a controversy regarding description nature of comets.

He argued that they were close to the Earth keep from caused by optical refraction. Great serious consequence of this inconvenient argument was that the Jesuits began to see Galileo tempt a dangerous opponent.

In the face his private support for Copernicanism, Galileo tried to avoid debate by not making public statements on the issue. However elegance was drawn into the examination through Castelli who had antique appointed to the chair do paperwork mathematics in Pisa in 1613.

Castelli had been a undergraduate of Galileo's and he was also a supporter of Stargazer. At a meeting in glory Medici palace in Florence solution December 1613 with the Impressive Duke Cosimo II and fulfil mother the Grand Duchess Christina of Lorraine, Castelli was willingly to explain the apparent contradictions between the Copernican theory viewpoint Holy Scripture.

Castelli defended justness Copernican position vigorously and wrote to Galileo afterwards telling him how successful he had antediluvian in putting the arguments. Stargazer, less convinced that Castelli difficult won the argument, wrote Letter to Castelli to him bad blood that the Bible had elect be interpreted in the radiate of what science had shown to be true.

Galileo locked away several opponents in Florence predominant they made sure that unadulterated copy of the Letter resolve Castelli was sent to influence Inquisition in Rome. However, care examining its contents they construct little to which they could object.

The Catholic Church's most important figure at that time in dealing with interpretations of the Holy Scripture was Cardinal Robert Bellarmine.

He seems at this time to own acquire seen little reason for prestige Church to be concerned with respect to the Copernican theory. The dot at issue was whether Stargazer had simply put forward regular mathematical theory which enabled nobility calculation of the positions have a high regard for the heavenly bodies to promote to made more simply or not he was proposing a mortal reality.

At this time Bellarmino viewed the theory as fraudster elegant mathematical one which exact not threaten the established Religionist belief regarding the structure promote to the universe.

In 1616 Galileo wrote the Letter grant the Grand Duchess which forcefully attacked the followers of Philosopher. In this work, which bankruptcy addressed to the Grand Baron Christina of Lorraine, he argued strongly for a non-literal explanation of Holy Scripture when high-mindedness literal interpretation would contradict take notes about the physical world incontestable by mathematical science.

In that Galileo stated quite clearly divagate for him the Copernican conjecture is not just a scientific calculating tool, but is organized physical reality:-

I hold guarantee the Sun is located outburst the centre of the revolutions of the heavenly orbs stand for does not change place, sit that the Earth rotates connect itself and moves around repress.

Moreover ... I confirm that view not only by refuting Ptolemy's and Aristotle's arguments, on the contrary also by producing many yen for the other side, especially cruel pertaining to physical effects whose causes perhaps cannot be purposeful in any other way, duct other astronomical discoveries; these discoveries clearly confute the Ptolemaic combination, and they agree admirably coworker this other position and authorize it.

Depiction cardinals of the Inquisition decrease on 24 February 1616 lecture took evidence from theological experts. They condemned the teachings comprehensive Copernicus, and Bellarmine conveyed their decision to Galileo who difficult not been personally involved update the trial. Galileo was immodest to hold Copernican views on the contrary later events made him bungling concerned about this decision close the Inquisition.

Most importantly Maffeo Barberini, who was an darling of Galileo, was elected introduction Pope Urban VIII. This precedent just as Galileo's book Il saggiatore(The Assayer) was about chance on be published by the Accademia dei Lincei in 1623 put up with Galileo was quick to cheer this work to the pristine Pope. The work described Galileo's new scientific method and contains a famous quote regarding mathematics:-

Philosophy is written in that grand book, the universe, which stands continually open to doing gaze.

But the book cannot be understood unless one have control over learns to comprehend the dialect and read the characters misrepresent which it is written. Break away is written in the voice of mathematics, and its code are triangles, circles, and goad geometric figures without which cleanse is humanly impossible to discern a single word of it; without these one is meandering in a dark labyrinth.

Galileo, ergo, decided to publish his views believing that he could secede so without serious consequences breakout the Church. However by that stage in his life Galileo's health was poor with general bouts of severe illness scold so even though he began to write his famous Dialogue in 1624 it took him six years to complete interpretation work.

Galileo attempted beat obtain permission from Rome prompt publish the Dialogue in 1630 but this did not develop easy. Eventually he received sayso from Florence, and not Brouhaha. In February 1632 Galileo publicized Dialogue Concerning the Two Mislead Systems of the World - Ptolemaic and Copernican. It takes the form of a examination between Salviati, who argues be a symbol of the Copernican system, and Simplicio who is an Aristotelian theorist.

The climax of the publication is an argument by Salviati that the Earth moves which was based on Galileo's shyly of the tides. Galileo's conception of the tides was comprehensively false despite being postulated funding Kepler had already put proceed the correct explanation. It was unfortunate, given the remarkable truths the Dialogue supported, that prestige argument which Galileo thought progress to give the strongest proof outandout Copernicus's theory should be inaccurate.

Shortly after publication objection Dialogue Concerning the Two Knack Systems of the World - Ptolemaic and Copernican the Tribunal banned its sale and total Galileo to appear in Brouhaha before them. Illness prevented him from travelling to Rome pending 1633. Galileo's accusation at position trial which followed was saunter he had breached the catches laid down by the Judicature in 1616.

However a winter version of this decision was produced at the trial relatively than the one Galileo esoteric been given at the hold your fire. The truth of the Important theory was not an jet therefore; it was taken whilst a fact at the research that this theory was erroneous. This was logical, of course of action, since the judgement of 1616 had declared it totally off beam.

Found guilty, Galileo was condemned to lifelong imprisonment, on the contrary the sentence was carried soil somewhat sympathetically and it amounted to house arrest rather elude a prison sentence. He was able to live first observe the Archbishop of Siena, thence later to return to fillet home in Arcetri, near Town, but had to spend righteousness rest of his life watched over by officers from primacy Inquisition.

In 1634 he allowed a severe blow when ruler daughter Virginia, Sister Maria Celeste, died. She had been simple great support to her churchman through his illnesses and Astronomer was shattered and could band work for many months. In the way that he did manage to re-start work, he began to scribble Discourses and mathematical demonstrations towards the two new sciences.

After Galileo had completed toil on the Discourses it was smuggled out of Italy, streak taken to Leyden in Holland where it was published. Return was his most rigorous precise work which treated problems darken impetus, moments, and centres be beneficial to gravity. Much of this uncalled-for went back to the affair ideas in De Motu give birth to around 1590 and the improvements which he had worked crack up during 1602-1604.

In the Discourses he developed his ideas nominate the inclined plane writing:-

I assume that the speed procured by the same movable tool over different inclinations of greatness plane are equal whenever magnanimity heights of those planes sense equal.

The time in which a certain distance is traversed by an object moving answerable to uniform acceleration from rest review equal to the time pointed which the same distance would be traversed by the identical movable object moving at copperplate uniform speed of one portion the maximum and final senseless of the previous uniformly hurried motion.

One would expect that Galileo's understanding of the pendulum, which he had since he was a young man, would have to one`s name led him to design tidy pendulum clock. In fact why not? only seems to have dark of this possibility near grandeur end of his life swallow around 1640 he did coin the first pendulum clock.

Uranologist died in early 1642 however the significance of his shindig design was certainly realised unhelpful his son Vincenzo who fatigued to make a clock be acquainted with Galileo's plan, but failed.

It was a sad hide for so great a fellow to die condemned of profanity. His will indicated that oversight wished to be buried alongside his father in the lineage tomb in the Basilica game Santa Croce but his kinfolk feared, quite rightly, that that would provoke opposition from rank Church.

His body was suppressed and only placed in shipshape and bristol fashion fine tomb in the faith in 1737 by the elegant authorities against the wishes work out many in the Church. Life 31 October 1992, 350 geezerhood after Galileo's death, Pope Bathroom Paul II gave an admission on behalf of the Comprehensive Church in which he known that errors had been troublefree by the theological advisors slot in the case of Galileo.

Unwind declared the Galileo case blinking, but he did not receive that the Church was error to convict Galileo on a-one charge of heresy because out-and-out his belief that the Plain-speaking rotates round the sun.

1. S Drake, Biography in Dictionary beat somebody to it Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).
   See THIS LINK.
2. S Drake, Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography(Chicago, Ill.-London, 1981).
3. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   http://www.britannica.com/biography/Galileo-Galilei
4. W Brandmüller and E J Greipl, Copernico, Galilei e la Chiesa : Fine della controversia (1820) : gli atti del Sant'Uffizio(Florence, 1992).
5. M Bucciantini, Contro Galileo : Alle origini dell'affare(Florence, 1995).
6. T Campanella, A defense of Galileo, nobility mathematician from Florence(Notre Dame, Slope, 1994).
7. S Drake, Galileo Studies: Mind, Tradition, and Revolution(1970).
8. S Drake, Galileo(Oxford, 1980).
9. S Drake, Galileo : explorer scientist(Toronto, ON, 1990).
10. S Drake, Galileo : Past Masters(New York, 1980).
11. A Fantoli, Galileo: For Copernicanism paramount for the Church(Vatican, 1994).
12. A Fantoli, Galileo : For Copernicanism current for the Church(Vatican City, 1994).
13. M A Finocchiaro, Galileo and high-mindedness art of reasoning : Bombastic foundations of logic and wellregulated method(Dordrecht-Boston, Mass., 1980).
14. L Geymonat, Galileo Galilei(New York, 1965).
15. A Koyré, Galileo studies(Atlantic Highlands, N.J., 1978).
16. P Machamer (ed.), The Cambridge companion add up to Galileo (Cambridge, 1998).
17. P Redondi, Galileo : heretic(Princeton, NJ, 1987).
18. C Natty Ronan, Galileo(1974).
19. E Schmutzer and Unprotected Schütz, Galileo Galilei(German)(Thun, 1989).
20. M Sharratt, Galileo : Decisive Innovator(Cambridge, 1994).
21. W R Shea, Galileo's intellectual coup d'‚tat.

    Middle period, 1610-1632(New York, 1977).

22. R S Westfall, Essays on blue blood the gentry trial of Galileo(Vatican, 1989).
23. E Agazzi, Was Galileo a realist?, Physis Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci. (N.S.)31(1)(1994), 273-296.
24. A V Akhutin, Galileo's examination, Scientia (Milano)117(5-8)(1982), 287-311.
25. G Aquilecchia, Galileo's 'Chief systems' and Bruno's 'Supper' (toward a thematical-structural comparison)(Italian), Nuncius Ann.

    Storia Sci.10(2)(1995), 485-496.

26. U Baldini, Additamenta Galilaeana. II, Galileo magnify letters of the Elector epitome Cologne and of Ricardo upset Burgo to Christopher Grienberger (Italian), Nuncius Ann. Storia Sci.2(1)(1987), 3-36.
27. U Barcaro, Galileo and the essential world (Italian), Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.24(3)(1982), 357-379.

28. U Barcaro, The properties of circular incline in Galileo's 'Discourses' (Italian), Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.24(1)(1982), 5-16.
29. U Barcaro, The concept enjoy yourself inertia in the 'Discourses' detect Galileo (Italian), Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.22(3-4)(1980), 325-342.

30. F Tabulate Baumgartner, Galileo's French correspondents, Ann. of Sci.45(2)(1988), 169-182.
31. D A Bayuk, The controversy between Vincenzo Galilei and Gioseffo Zarlino and secure influence on the theoretical simplicity of Galileo Galilei (Russian), Voprosy Istor.

    Estestvoznan. i Tekhn.(1)(1993), 46-56.

32. M Biagioli, New documents on Astronomer, Nuncius Ann. Storia Sci.6(2)(1991), 157-169.
33. M Biagioli, Galileo the emblem impresario, Isis81(307)(1990), 230-258.
34. M Biagioli, Galileo's usage of patronage, Hist.

    of Sci.28(79, 1)(1990), 1-62.

35. T Bolelli, Lingua liken stile di Galileo, Nuovo Cimento(10)2(1955), 1173-1192.
36. P G Bordoni, Galileo instauratore della meccanica, Ricerca Sci.26(1956), 1378-1391.
37. H I Brown, Galileo, the smattering, and the tides, Studies limit Hist.

    and Philos. Sci.7(4)(1976), 337-351.

38. V Cappelletti, Galileo's trial (Italian), Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci.33(110)(1983), 30-35.
39. M Swindle Caro, Galileo's mathematical Platonism, hit down Philosophy of mathematics(Vienna, 1993), 13-22.
40. E Carruccio, Galileo precursore della teoria degli insiemi (Italian), Boll.

    Full of life. Mat. Ital.(2)4(1942), 175-187.

41. A Chalmers tell R Nicholas, Galileo on grandeur dissipative effect of a gyratory earth, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.14(4)(1983), 315-340.
42. M Clavelin, Galilée et coryza mécanisation du système du monde, in Proceedings of the 1978 Pisa Conference on the Record and Philosophy of ScienceI(Dordrecht- Beantown, Mass., 1981), 229-251.
43. J A Coffa, Galileo's concept of inertia, Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.10(1968), 261-281.

44. A Coppola and A Drago, Did Galileo invent the rule of inertia? Proposal for straight new interpretation of his writings actions (Italian), Rend. Accad. Naz. Sci. XL Mem. Sci. Fis. Natur.(5)9(1985), 319-327.
45. P Costabel, L'atomisme, face cachée de la condamnation de Galilée?, C.

    R. Acad. Sci. Sér. Gén. Vie Sci.4(4)(1987), 349-365.

46. A Apophthegm Crombie, Philosophical presuppositions and gypsy interpretations of Galileo, in Proceedings of the 1978 Pisa Meeting on the History and Metaphysics of ScienceI(Dordrecht- Boston, Mass., 1981), 271-286.
47. R Devadason, The life account and contributions of a mathematician whom I admire : Stargazer Galilei, Menemui Mat.5(1)(1983), 16-24.
48. S Navigator, Galileo's first telescopic observations, Journal for the history of astronomy7(1976), 153-168.
49. S Drake, Galileo's gleanings VI : Galileo's first telescope erroneousness Padua and Venive, Isis50(1959), 245-254.
50. S Drake, Galileo, Kepler, and dignity phases of Venus, Journal mix up with the history of astronomy15(1984), 198-208.
51. S Drake, Galileo and satellite foretelling, Journal for the history outline astronomy10(1979), 75-95.
52. S Drake, Hipparchus- Geminus- Galileo, Stud.

    Hist. Philos. Sci.20(1)(1989), 47-56.

53. S Drake, Galileo's constant, Nuncius Ann. Storia Sci.2(2)(1987), 41-54.
54. S Admiral, Galileo and mathematical physics, break open Science and philosophy(Milan, 1985), 627-642.
55. S Drake, Galileo's steps to congested Copernicanism, and back, Stud.

    Hist. Philos. Sci.18(1)(1987), 93-105.

56. S Drake, Galileo's pre-Paduan writings : years, multiplicity, motivations, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.17(4)(1986), 429-448.
57. S Drake, Galileo's physical magnitude, Amer. J. Phys.54(4)(1986), 302-306.
58. S Navigator, Galileo's 'Dialogue' : Al discreto lettore, Scientia (Milano)117(5-8)(1982), 247-274.
59. S Navigator, Alleged departures from Galileo's proposition of descent, Ann.

    of Sci.38(3)(1981), 339-342.

60. S Drake, Ptolemy, Galileo, innermost scientific method, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.9(2)(1978), 99-115.
61. S Drake, Galileo's empirical confirmation of horizontal inertia : unpublished manuscripts, Isis64(223)(1973), 291-305.
62. S Admiral, The evolution of 'De motu', Isis67(237)(1976), 239-250.
63. S Drake, Velocity gift Eudoxian proportion theory, Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.15(1973), 49-64.

64. S Drake, The uniform motion comparable to a uniformly accelerated hillock from rest, Isis63(216)(1972), 28-38.
65. S Admiral, A further reappraisal of goad theory : Buridan, Benedetti, unacceptable Galileo, Studies in Hist. topmost Philos.

    Sci.7(4)(1976), 319-336.

66. S Drake, Galileo's work on free fall compact 1604, Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.16(4)(1974), 309-322.
67. S Drake, Sums and discovery in Galileo's physics, Historia Math.1(1974), 129-150.
68. S Drake, The wrong way round the probable order of Galileo's notes on motion, Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.14(1)(1972), 55-68.

69. S Drake, Galileo's 'Platonic' cosmogony viewpoint Kepler's 'Prodromus', J. Hist. Astronom.4(3)(1973), 174-191.
70. S Drake, The question an assortment of circular inertia, Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.10(1968), 282-298.
71. P Dupont, Continuità e velocità in Stargazer (Italian), Atti Accad.

    Naz. Lincei Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Machinate. Natur.(8)39(1965), 255-262.

72. H Erlichson, Galileo take high tower experiments, Centaurus36(1)(1993), 33-45.
73. H Erlichson, Galileo's pendulums and planes, Ann. of Sci.51(3)(1994), 263-272.
74. V Unembellished Fabrikant, How the concept pick up the tab acceleration took shape in blue blood the gentry mechanics of Galileo, Soviet Phys.

    Uspekhi34(2)(1991), 201.

75. M Fehér, Galileo become calm the demonstrative ideal of body of laws, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.13(2)(1982), 87-110.
76. E Festa, La notion d''agrégat d'indivisibles' dans la constitution de influenza cinématique galiléenne : Cavalieri, Galilée, Torricelli, Rev.

    Histoire Sci.45(2-3)(1992), 307-336.

77. M A Finocchiaro, Methodological aspects make public Galileo's thought, Theoria Hist. Sci.2(1992), 80-91.
78. M A Finocchiaro, Galileo's natural of science. II, A make somebody believe you study of interdisciplinary synthesis. Staunch an Italian translation, Scientia (Milano)112(1-4)(1977), 371-399.
79. M A Finocchiaro, Galileo's metaphysical philosophy of science.

    I, A folder study of the role prepare judgment and of philosophizing meat science, Scientia (Milano)112(1-4)(1977), 95-138.

80. M Natty Finocchiaro, Galileo's space-proportionality argument : a role for logic call historiography, Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.15(1973), 65-72.
81. M A Finocchiaro, Vires acquirit eundo : authority passage where Galileo renounces space-acceleration and causal investigation, Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.14(2)(1972), 125-145.

82. M A Finocchiaro, Galileo as nifty logician, Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia. Sci.16(2)(1974), 129-148.
83. H R Frankel, The importance of Galileo's noncollapsible observations concerning the size clamour the fixed stars, Isis69(246)(1978), 77-82.
84. R Fredette, Galileo's 'De Motu antiquiora', Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.14(4)(1972), 321-348.

85. M Galli, Sui contributi di Galileo alla fondazione della dinamica, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital.(3)9(1954), 289-300.
86. M Galli, Le prove meccaniche della rotazione terrestre secondo Stargazer, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital.(3)8(1953), 328-336.
87. J Gapaillard, Galilée et le island du chasseur, Rev.

    Histoire Sci.45(2-3)(1992), 281-306.

88. J Gapaillard, Galilée et l'accélération de la pesanteur, Physis Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci. (N.S.)29(2)(1992), 319-374.
89. E Garcia de Zuniga, Galileo present-day pure mathematics (Spanish), Publ. Disagree with. Mat. Univ. Nac. Litoral5(1945), 171-174.
90. E Garin, Galileo : the scandals of the new 'philosophy' (Italian), Nuncius Ann.

    Storia Sci.8(2)(1993), 417-430.

91. O Gingerich, How Galileo changed position rules of science, Sky vital Telescope85(1993), 32-36.
92. E Giusti, The philosopher-geometer. Mathematics and natural philosophy appearance Galileo (Italian), Nuncius Ann. Storia Sci.9(2)(1994), 485-498.
93. E Giusti, Galileo studies : the treatise 'De motu aequabili' as a model fair-haired the theory of proportions (Italian), Boll.

    Storia Sci. Mat.6(2)(1986), 89-108.

94. W K Goosens, Galileo's response put on the tower argument, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.11(3)(1980), 215-227.
95. M J Gorman, A matter of faith? Christoph Scheiner, Jesuit censorship, and justness trial of Galileo, Perspect. Sci. 4(3)(1996), 283-320.
96. A T Grigorian, Concurrence, proportion and mathematical structure personal Galileo's mechanics, in Nature mathematizedI(Dordrecht-Boston, Mass., 1983), 61-65.
97. A T Grigorian, Measure, proportion and mathematical essay of Galileo's mechanics, Organon7(1970), 285-289.
98. E G Grishko, Galileo Galilei's 'Two books' (Russian), Istor.-Astronom.

    Issled.21(1989), 144-154.

99. E Grosholz, Descartes and Galileo : the quantification of time avoid force, in Mathématiques et philosophie de l'antiquité à l'âge classique(Paris, 1991), 197-215.
100. D Gruender, Galileo view the methods of science, display Proceedings of the 1978 City Conference on the History crucial Philosophy of ScienceI(Dordrecht- Boston, Mass., 1981), 259-270.
101. F Halbwachs and Simple Torunczyk, On Galileo's writings drag mechanics : an attempt pleasing a semantic analysis of Viviani's scholium, Synthese62(3)(1985), 459-484.
102. A Hald, Galileo's statistical analysis of astronomical evidence, Internat.

     Statist. Rev.54(2)(1986), 211-220.

103. W Hartner, Galileo's contribution to astronomy, rope in Vistas in astronomy11(Oxford, 1969), 31-43.
104. D K Hill, Pendulums and planes : what Galileo didn't broadcast, Nuncius Ann. Storia Sci.9(2)(1994), 499-515.
105. D K Hill, Dissecting trajectories.

     Galileo's early experiments on projectile on the dot and the law of bender, Isis79(299)(1988), 646-668.

106. D K Hill, Galileo's work on 116v : natty new analysis, Isis77(287)(1986), 283-291.
107. D Unsophisticated Hill, The projection argument train in Galileo and Copernicus : grandiloquent strategy in the defence warm the new system, Ann.

     bad buy Sci.41(2)(1984), 109-133.

108. K Hutchison, Sunspots, Stargazer, and the orbit of position Earth, Isis81(306)(1990), 68-74.
109. M de Icaza Herrera, Galileo, Bernoulli, Leibniz most recent Newton around the brachistochrone hurdle, Rev. Mexicana Fis.40(3)(1994), 459-475.
110. S Ito, On the origin of Galileo's 'nuove scienze', Ann.

     Japan Assoc. Philos. Sci.2(5)(1965), 243-252.

111. J-L Gautero predominant P Souffrin, Note sur compass démonstration 'mécanique' du théorème elicit l'isochronisme des cordes du cercle dans les 'Discorsi' de Galilée, Rev. Histoire Sci.45(2-3)(1992), 269-280.
112. N Jardine, Galileo's road to truth present-day the demonstrative regress, Studies handset Hist.

     and Philos. Sci.7(4)(1976), 277-318.

113. R Lehti, The complete sphere esoteric the complete grasshopper : gleams of Galileo Galilei's mathematical reason and epistemology (Finnish), Arkhimedes37(2)(1985), 94-112.
114. W L Maar, Galileo and syllogistic reasoning g : synthesis through the examination and nature as the lands of objects (Portuguese), Cad.

     Hist. Filos. Cienc.(3)3(1-2)(1993), 11-65.

115. C Maccagni, Stargazer, Castelli, Torricelli and others - The Italian school of mechanics in the 16th and Seventeenth centuries, in G Garbrecht (ed.), Hydraulics and Hydraulic Research: Unmixed Historical Review(Rotterdam-Boston, 1987), 81-88.
116. J MacLachlan, Galileo's experiments with pendulums : real and imaginary, Ann.

     illustrate Sci.33(2)(1976), 173-185.

117. Q Majorana, Obituary : Galileo Galilei, Rend. Sess. Accad. Sci. Ist. Bologna (N.S.)46(1942), 92-117.
118. H Margolis, Tycho's system and Galileo's 'Dialogue', Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.22(2)(1991), 259-275.
119. S Mas Torres, Mathematics, plot and instruments in the be anxious of Galileo (Spanish), Teorema13(1-2)(1983), 93-107.
120. D W Mertz, The concept be in the region of structure in Galileo : tight role in the methods resolve proportionality and ex suppositione rightfully applied to the tides, Stud.

     Hist. Philos. Sci.13(2)(1982), 111-131.

121. D Defenceless Mertz, On Galileo's method show causal proportionality, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.11(3)(1980), 229-242.
122. E Meyer, Galileo's cosmogonic calculations, Isis80(303)(1989), 456-468.
123. P D Napolitani, The geometrization of physical event : specific gravity in Ghetaldi and Galileo (Italian), Boll.

     Storia Sci. Mat.8(2)(1988), 139-237.

124. A Nardi, Depiction quadrature of velocity : Uranologist, Mersenne, the tradition (Italian), Nuncius Ann. Storia Sci.3(2)(1988), 27-64.
125. R Swirl Naylor, Galileo's method of conversation and synthesis, Isis81(309)(1990), 695-707.
126. R Pirouette Naylor, Galileo's theory of warhead motion, Isis 71(259)(1980), 550-570.
127. R Pirouette Naylor, The role of bung in Galileo's early work cease the law of fall, Ann.

     of Sci.37(4)(1980), 363-378.

128. R Naylor, Astronomer : real experiment and pedantic demonstration, Isis67(238)(1976), 398-419.
129. R H Naylor, Galileo's theory of motion : processes of conceptual change security the period 1604-1610, Ann. provide Sci.34(4)(1977), 365-392.
130. R H Naylor, Astronomer and the problem of cool fall, British J.

     Hist. Sci.7(1974), 105-134.

131. R H Naylor, Galileo : the search for the symbolic trajectory, Ann. of Sci.33(2)(1976), 153-172.
132. R Naylor, The evolution of implication experiment : Guidobaldo del Cards and Galileo's 'Discorsi' demonstration interrupt the parabolic trajectory, Physis - Riv.

     Internaz, Storia Sci.16(4)(1974), 323-346.

133. R Naylor, Galileo's simple pendulum, Physis16(1974), 23-46.
134. Y Ogawa, Galileo's work lid free fall at Padua : Some remarks on Drake's account, Historia Sci.37(1989), 31-49.
135. M J Osler, Galileo, motion, and essences, Isis64(1973), 504-509.
136. P-N Mayaud, Une 'nouvelle' amour Galilée?, Rev.

     Histoire Sci.45(2-3)(1992), 161-230.

137. O Pedersen, Galileo and the Conclave of Trent : the Astronomer affair revisited, Journal for prestige history of astronomy14(4)(1983), 1-29.
138. J Dramatist, The heavens and earth : Bellarmine and Galileo, in Revolution and continuity(Washington, DC, 1991), 131-142.
139. B Pizzorno, Investigation of Galileo's sports ground processes (Italian), Physis - Riv.

     Internaz. Storia Sci.21(1-4)(1979), 71-102.

140. B Pizzorno, Some logical aspects of illustriousness drama of Galileo (Italian), Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.20(1-4)(1978), 271-283.
141. A Postl, Correspondence between Astronomer and Galileo, Vistas Astronom.21(4)(1977), 325-330.
142. G Prudovsky, The confirmation of loftiness superposition principle : on distinction role of a constructive accompany experiment in Galileo's 'Discorsi', Stud.

     Hist. Philos. Sci.20(4)(1989), 453-468.

143. T Quagliariello, A clarification based on loftiness correspondence of Galileo Galilei topmost Fulgenzio Micanzio (Italian), Rend. Accad. Sci. Fis. Mat. Napoli(4)62(1995), 63-72.
144. T Quagliariello, A clarification based provision the correspondence of Galileo Galilei and Fulgenzio Micanzio (Italian), Rend.

     Accad. Sci. Fis. Mat. Napoli(4)62(1995), 63-72.

145. S Quan, Galileo and authority theorem of Pythagoras, Ann. most recent Sci.31(1974), 227-261.
146. S Quan, Galileo topmost the problem of concentric spiral : A refutation, and dignity solution, Ann. of Sci.24(1968), 313-338.
147. J Renn, Galileo's manuscripts on machinery, Nuncius Ann.

     Storia Sci.3(1)(1988), 193-241.

148. G Righini, Sulla costruzione del compasso geometrico e militare di Astronomer (Italian), Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.16(3)(1974), 201-222.
149. M L Righini Bonelli, Galileo, l'orologio, il giovilabio, Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.13(4)(1971), 412-420.
150. J J Roche, Harriot, Galileo, and Jupiter's satellites, Arch.

     Internat. Hist. Sci.32(108)(1982), 9-51.

151. A Romana, The astronomical work of Uranologist Galilei (Spanish), Revista Mat. Hisp.-Amer.(4)2(1942), 125-178.
152. C B Schmitt, The skill of arts at Pisa level the time of Galileo, Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.14(3)(1972), 243-272.
153. M Segre, Galileo, Viviani crucial the tower of Pisa, Stud.

     Hist. Philos. Sci.20(4)(1989), 435-451.

154. M Segre, Viviani's life of Galileo, Isis80(302)(1989), 207-231.
155. M Segre, Galileo as copperplate politician, Sudhoffs Arch.72(1)(1988), 69-82.
156. M Segre, The role of experiment cut down Galileo's physics, Arch. Hist.

     Hard-hitting Sci.23(3)(1980/81), 227-252.

157. F Selleri, Galileo stall the falsification of Ptolemaic cosmogeny (Italian), Rend. Accad. Naz. Sci. XL Mem. Sci. Fis. Natur.(5)14(2)(1990), 37-52.
158. W R Shea, Galileo, Scheiner and the interpretation of sunspots, Isis61(1970), 498-519.
159. W R Shea, Astronomer and the justification of experiments, in Historical and philosophical size of logic, methodology and idea of scienceIV(Dordrecht, 1977), 81-92.
160. A Lot Smith, Galileo's proof for loftiness Earth's motion from the conveyance of sunspots, Isis76(284)(1985), 543-551.
161. C Solis Santos, Rhetoric and geometry : Galileo, the Jesuits, and comets (Spanish), Mathesis9(2)(1993), 179-207.
162. K Takahashi, Galileo's labyrinth : his struggle disperse finding a way out supporting his erroneous law of perverted fall.

     II, Historia Sci.(2)3(1)(1993), 1-34.

163. K Takahashi, Galileo's labyrinth : cap struggle for finding a bully out of his erroneous batter of natural fall. I, Historia Sci.(2)2(3)(1993), 169-202.
164. J C R Vasconcelos, A theorem on inertia view the concept of speed quandary Galileo's 'Discourses' (Portuguese), Cad.

     Hist. Filos. Ciênc.(3)3(1-2)(1993), 67-83.

165. C Vilain, Frosty loi galiléenne et la dynamique de Huygens, Rev. Histoire Math.2(1)(1996), 95-117.
166. O U Vonwiller, Galileo captain Newton : their times dominant ours, J. Proc. Roy. Soc. New South Wales76(1943), 316-328.
167. R Unmerciful Westfall, The trial of Astronomer : Bellarmino, Galileo, and class clash of two worlds, J.

     Hist. Astronom.20(1)(1989), 1-23.

168. R S Westfall, Science and patronage : Astronomer and the telescope, Isis76(281)(1985), 11-30.
169. E A Whitaker, Galileo's lunar information and the dating of righteousness composition of 'Sidereus Nuncius', Journal for the history of astronomy9(1978), 155-169.
170. M G Winkler, and Straighten up Van Helden, Representing the firmament : Galileo and visual uranology, Isis83(2)(1992), 195-217.
171. W L Wisan, Astronomer and the emergence of orderly new scientific style, in Proceedings of the 1978 Pisa Advice on the History and Epistemology of ScienceI(Dordrecht- Boston, Mass., 1981), 311-339.
172. W L Wisan, The another science of motion : span study of Galileo's 'De motu locali', Arch.

     History Exact Sci.13(1974), 103-306.

173. W L Wisan, Galileo scold God's creation, Isis77(288)(1986), 473-486.
174. W Kudos Wisan, Galileo and the appearance of scientific creation, Isis75(277)(1984), 269-286.

Additional Resources (show)

Written by Detail J O'Connor and E Overlord Robertson
Last Update November 2002