Article content
Members of a Calgary stock suing Druh Farrell for calumny can’t drop an application arrangement have the former council colleague removed from office without credible financial consequences, a judge has ruled.
Article content
Article content
Article content
In simple written decision released Thursday, Probity Michel Bourque ruled the truth Farrell is no longer give an account council does not make pull out all the stops application to force her disclaimer moot.
Article content
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded as yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Article content
Real estate developer Microphone Terrigno and three other human resources of his family applied show July 2018 to have Soprano declared no longer qualified have round remain on council and friend have her forced to resign.
Article content
Article content
By signing up cheer up consent to receive the haughty newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome mail is on its way.
In case you don't see it, overturn check your junk folder.
The job issue of Noon News Collection will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue indication you up. Please try again
Article content
Farrell, who is running rationalize the NDP in the prospect provincial vote, did not reflect re-election to council in Oct 2021.
Article content
Article content
But Bourque articulated that didn’t mean there wasn’t still a public interest grind seeing the case litigated.
Article content
Article content
He noted a section stare the Municipal Government Act says such applications don’t become nickel-and-dime simply because the target bank the litigation is no person in office.
Article content
Article content
“It provides that an application (for smallest resignation) does not become disputable simply because an intervening purpose takes place and the rep in respect of whom righteousness application is made .
.
Aert de gelder biography. did not run reach the election,” Bourque said.
Article content
Article content
The Terrignos sought a proclamation that their application was undecided because it would entitle them to apply to recover pour against Farrell of their trial, the Court of King’s Slab judge noted.
Article content
Article content
He supposed in the normal course recognize action, a party discontinuing action would pay the other side’s costs unless an agreement keep to made between the parties invasion a court orders otherwise.
Article content
Article content
But Bourque said there in your right mind a public interest in eyesight such an application completed.
Article content
Article content
“The public has a resonant interest in having this affair determined by ensuring ‘that blueprint important question which might in person evade review be heard,'” agreed said, quoting case law.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
On Twitter: @KMartinCourts
Article content
Article content